this timing are quite back dated,but stil i decided to share-:
1. Kawasaki ZX-9R 1994 11.5
Ferrari Enzo 2003 tested independently 11.7
Porsche 911 Turbo 2003 13.5
2. Performance 911 Turbo 1996 13.7
Dodge Viper SRT-10 2003 13.9
3. Porsche 911 Turbo 1996 14.0
Lamborghini Murciélago 2003 14.2
Saleen S7 2003 14.3
4. HKS Toyota Supra Turbo 1996 14.7
Ferrari 575M Maranello 2003 14.8
5. Vortech Ford Mustang GT 1996 14.9
6. Dodge Viper GTS 1996 15.0
Mercedes-Benz E55 AMG 2003 15.0
Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG 2003 15.1
7. Aston Martin Vantage 600 1999 16.3
Audi RS 6 2003 16.3
8. Porsche 911 Turbo 3.6 1994 16.4
9. Ferrari F355 1999, tested independently 17.1
10. Shelby Cobra 427 S/C 1994 17.1
11. Mercedes-Benz SL600 1996 17.2
12. Dodge Viper RT/10 1994 17.2
13. Aston Martin DB7 Vantage 1999 17.3
14. Chevrolet Corvette ZR-1 1994 17.3
15. Caterham 7 Superlight R 1999 17.4
16. Chevrolet Corvette LT4 Collector Edition 1996 17.4
17. Ferrari 512TR 1994 17.5
18. Jaguar XKR 1999 17.6
19. Chevrolet Corvette C5 1999, tested independently 17.7
20. Lotus Elise Sport 190 1999 17.9
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
burnin' ruBBer!
Guru
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
what are the unit for the numbers? are those in seconds? if so, then these can't be 0-100 times? looks way slower.....its probably the quater mile timing.....infact its even pretty slow for quarter miles.....cause it says Enzo's timing is 11.7, where Enzo can pull off 1/4 mile in 11.1 secs @ 133 mph. and the 0-100 mph is in 6.6 secs
for Murcuelago it says 14.2, where Murcielago can do 1/4 mile
in 12 secs flat @ 121 mph. and 0-100 mph in 8.6 secs.
same goes for all the other cars. they are way more faster than its listed in that list.
for Murcuelago it says 14.2, where Murcielago can do 1/4 mile
in 12 secs flat @ 121 mph. and 0-100 mph in 8.6 secs.
same goes for all the other cars. they are way more faster than its listed in that list.
Super Moderator
maybe i got wrong infozoheb wrote:what are the unit for the numbers? are those in seconds? if so, then these can't be 0-100 times? looks way slower.....its probably the quater mile timing.....infact its even pretty slow for quarter miles.....cause it says Enzo's timing is 11.7, where Enzo can pull off 1/4 mile in 11.1 secs @ 133 mph. and the 0-100 mph is in 6.6 secs
for Murcuelago it says 14.2, where Murcielago can do 1/4 mile
in 12 secs flat @ 121 mph. and 0-100 mph in 8.6 secs.
same goes for all the other cars. they are way more faster than its listed in that list.
burnin' ruBBer!
Modder
may b cauz it luks kidda oddrawfin wrote:maybe i got wrong infozoheb wrote:what are the unit for the numbers? are those in seconds? if so, then these can't be 0-100 times? looks way slower.....its probably the quater mile timing.....infact its even pretty slow for quarter miles.....cause it says Enzo's timing is 11.7, where Enzo can pull off 1/4 mile in 11.1 secs @ 133 mph. and the 0-100 mph is in 6.6 secs
for Murcuelago it says 14.2, where Murcielago can do 1/4 mile
in 12 secs flat @ 121 mph. and 0-100 mph in 8.6 secs.
same goes for all the other cars. they are way more faster than its listed in that list.
Super Moderator
Information
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest