Club Member
Arnab, it takes less than 1km of a straight road to hit 250 km/h from a standing start. Timed on the airport road, 100-200 km/h takes 8 sec, 100 km/h-240 km/h takes 15 sec. We obviously will not match magazine test times on our public roads. So, the airport road is sufficient when there is a little less traffic after midnight.
Club Member
The passenger used a stopwatch while reading from my SPA backlit digital speedo which reads to 400 km/h. But, I also have a 9.40 time based on a video of the speedo in real time taken on another day. During that run there was some traffic initially and I had to go real slow to 50 km/h and floored the throttle at around 60 km/h. But, by then initial turbo lag had cost me probably more than a second and so the slower time. The 100-240 km/h (approx. 60-150 mph) time was also slower (16 sec) that day because of the lazy start. I'll post the video soon.
Advanced Club Member
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 4:53 am
OT:
i have once seen it @ daylight @ Pantha poth.... tht was da only time i saw it.....
i have once seen it @ daylight @ Pantha poth.... tht was da only time i saw it.....
4AGE= 4 A Great Experience
'85 Corolla 4AGE 20V
'67 300SE
'86 March
[url="http://ae82oc.mitchee.com/"[img]http:// ... agepw8.jpg[/img][/url]
'85 Corolla 4AGE 20V
'67 300SE
'86 March
[url="http://ae82oc.mitchee.com/"[img]http:// ... agepw8.jpg[/img][/url]
Advanced Club Member
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 4:53 am
Club Member
Yes, you probably saw correct. I have trained up the owner of the garage who now knows how to work on my car. He usually works at my house but I was installing new driving lights with a range of 900m so he was welding on the support brackets.
Anyway, the car is no fun in traffic and I don't want to waste a racing clutch and expensive fuel additives ploughing through traffic ! Regarding the M5, I might be faster. Since I still have doubts it would have been great to meet the M5 in person under the same conditions, but, despite a few dates being fixed the meets did not take place. I have now lost hope of this happening.
Readers of this forum might find the following stats interesting. They were taken from actual road tests done by various magazines, however, some other magazines may show faster or slower times. Enjoy !
100-200 km/h, 100-240 km/h (62-150 mph)
mclaren f1, 6.3, 9.6 (Autozeitung, Ger)
Enzo, 7.06, 12.25 (Quattroruote, Italy)
Ferrari F40, 7.09, 12.11 (Autospinetti, Italy)
SLR, 7.2, 12.6 (Autobild, Ger)
Carrera GT, 7.4, 12.98 (Quattroruote, Italy)
Corvette Z06, 7.8, 13.8 (Car & Driver, Oct 05, USA)
Ferrari F50, 8.1, 14.5 (Autospinetti, Italy)
Ford GT, 8.4, 15.4 (Car & Driver, August 05, USA)
SL65 AMG, 8.7, 16.3 (Auto Motor Und Sport, Ger)
Lamborghini Diablo, 8.8, 15.8 (Topcar, Italy)
Ferrari F430, 8.9, 17.3 (Quattroruote, Italy & Autocar, UK)
Lamborghini Murcielago, 9.09, 15.98 (Quattroruote, Italy)
BMW M5, 10.1 (Auto Motor Und Sport), 16.3 (Autocar) & 17.7 (Evo, UK)
M3 CSL, 12.0, 23.6 (Autocar, Nov 03, Asean)
100-200 km/h :
Saleen S7, 7.80 (Car & Driver, USA)
Maserati MC12, 7.9 (Motortrend, USA)
911 GT2, 9.1 (Auto Motor Und Sport, Ger)
Aston Martin Vanquish, 11.8, (Auto Motor Und Sport, Ger)
BMW M3, 12.9 (Sport Auto, Ger)
Impreza STI, 17.9 (Car & Driver, Feb 05, USA)
Evo8 MR, 19.0 (Car & Driver, Feb 05, USA)
Lotus Elise 111R, 20.0, (Autocar 24 Feb 04)
100-240 km/h (62-150 mph) :
911 Turbo-S, 17.9 (Autocar 16 mar 04)
Anyway, the car is no fun in traffic and I don't want to waste a racing clutch and expensive fuel additives ploughing through traffic ! Regarding the M5, I might be faster. Since I still have doubts it would have been great to meet the M5 in person under the same conditions, but, despite a few dates being fixed the meets did not take place. I have now lost hope of this happening.
Readers of this forum might find the following stats interesting. They were taken from actual road tests done by various magazines, however, some other magazines may show faster or slower times. Enjoy !
100-200 km/h, 100-240 km/h (62-150 mph)
mclaren f1, 6.3, 9.6 (Autozeitung, Ger)
Enzo, 7.06, 12.25 (Quattroruote, Italy)
Ferrari F40, 7.09, 12.11 (Autospinetti, Italy)
SLR, 7.2, 12.6 (Autobild, Ger)
Carrera GT, 7.4, 12.98 (Quattroruote, Italy)
Corvette Z06, 7.8, 13.8 (Car & Driver, Oct 05, USA)
Ferrari F50, 8.1, 14.5 (Autospinetti, Italy)
Ford GT, 8.4, 15.4 (Car & Driver, August 05, USA)
SL65 AMG, 8.7, 16.3 (Auto Motor Und Sport, Ger)
Lamborghini Diablo, 8.8, 15.8 (Topcar, Italy)
Ferrari F430, 8.9, 17.3 (Quattroruote, Italy & Autocar, UK)
Lamborghini Murcielago, 9.09, 15.98 (Quattroruote, Italy)
BMW M5, 10.1 (Auto Motor Und Sport), 16.3 (Autocar) & 17.7 (Evo, UK)
M3 CSL, 12.0, 23.6 (Autocar, Nov 03, Asean)
100-200 km/h :
Saleen S7, 7.80 (Car & Driver, USA)
Maserati MC12, 7.9 (Motortrend, USA)
911 GT2, 9.1 (Auto Motor Und Sport, Ger)
Aston Martin Vanquish, 11.8, (Auto Motor Und Sport, Ger)
BMW M3, 12.9 (Sport Auto, Ger)
Impreza STI, 17.9 (Car & Driver, Feb 05, USA)
Evo8 MR, 19.0 (Car & Driver, Feb 05, USA)
Lotus Elise 111R, 20.0, (Autocar 24 Feb 04)
100-240 km/h (62-150 mph) :
911 Turbo-S, 17.9 (Autocar 16 mar 04)
Club Member
You are welcome Zoheb. However, we shouldn't read too much into the tests because cars should ideally be tested in the same conditions - track surface, ambient temperature, humidity, altitude - all affect power output and times. So, you may find wide divergance between various magazines and also differences among various tests of the same magazine done at different times. I am sure you already know that.
I use NF octane booster and some other additives with my fuel and the tires are Toyo R888.
I use NF octane booster and some other additives with my fuel and the tires are Toyo R888.
Club Member
ot:
Mclaren F1 :
Evo :
0-60 mph = 3.2
0-100 mph = 6.3
0-130 mph= 10.4
0-150 mph = 12.8
qtr mile = 11.1/138 mph
Autocar :
0-60 mph = 3.5
0-100 mph = 6.6
0-150 mph= 13.1
Road & Track, USA (car was modified to pass emmissions)
0-60 mph = 3.4
qtr mile = 11.6/125 mph
Enzo :
Car & Driver, July 03
0-60 mph = 3.3
0-100 mph = 6.6
0-130 mph= 10.3
qtr mile = 11.2/136 mph
Autobild :
0-62 mph = 3.94
0-100 mph = 8.04
Quattroruote :
0-62 mph = 3.68
0-100 mph = 7.21
0-130 mph = 11.63
0-150 mph = 15.93
So, you see Car & Driver say that Enzo and F1 are neck and neck. It can only be resolved with both tested together at the same time and venue. Though, most would probably agree F1 is still faster.
Mclaren F1 :
Evo :
0-60 mph = 3.2
0-100 mph = 6.3
0-130 mph= 10.4
0-150 mph = 12.8
qtr mile = 11.1/138 mph
Autocar :
0-60 mph = 3.5
0-100 mph = 6.6
0-150 mph= 13.1
Road & Track, USA (car was modified to pass emmissions)
0-60 mph = 3.4
qtr mile = 11.6/125 mph
Enzo :
Car & Driver, July 03
0-60 mph = 3.3
0-100 mph = 6.6
0-130 mph= 10.3
qtr mile = 11.2/136 mph
Autobild :
0-62 mph = 3.94
0-100 mph = 8.04
Quattroruote :
0-62 mph = 3.68
0-100 mph = 7.21
0-130 mph = 11.63
0-150 mph = 15.93
So, you see Car & Driver say that Enzo and F1 are neck and neck. It can only be resolved with both tested together at the same time and venue. Though, most would probably agree F1 is still faster.
so basically the stats say that the McLaren F1 is still the king among all of the cars named above and can beat the shit out of Enzo.
:offtopic:
wrx, u forgot to put the 0-150 mph stats........where F1 clocked 12.8 secs and Enzo clocked 13.1 secs. and not to mention....F1's top speed is 231 mph and Enzo's is 217 mph.
but yeah, the acceleration timings always vary from one source to another cause of different track, weather etc conditions...
and u should read this article....its by a guy who is a ferrari fan. He drove both cars and he admitted that F1 is the faster car. here is the link.
http://www.ferraris-online.com/Articles ... 8_SS.shtml
btw, i don't wanna ruin this thread by comparing these two cars.....if u wanna talk abt them, then i suggest opening a new topic.
no more off topics please.
wrx, u forgot to put the 0-150 mph stats........where F1 clocked 12.8 secs and Enzo clocked 13.1 secs. and not to mention....F1's top speed is 231 mph and Enzo's is 217 mph.
but yeah, the acceleration timings always vary from one source to another cause of different track, weather etc conditions...
and u should read this article....its by a guy who is a ferrari fan. He drove both cars and he admitted that F1 is the faster car. here is the link.
http://www.ferraris-online.com/Articles ... 8_SS.shtml
btw, i don't wanna ruin this thread by comparing these two cars.....if u wanna talk abt them, then i suggest opening a new topic.
no more off topics please.

Club Member
239 km/h in Dhaka -
Triad has uploaded the video in the videos section. Here's the link :
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=GEKUE6E2
Triad has uploaded the video in the videos section. Here's the link :
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=GEKUE6E2
Club Member
OT:
WRX mate...What type of fuel you Using in Dhaka for Speeds Like that...I mean here in London we use 99.8 % pure octane optimax for performance cars...where is that in Dhaka??
WRX mate...What type of fuel you Using in Dhaka for Speeds Like that...I mean here in London we use 99.8 % pure octane optimax for performance cars...where is that in Dhaka??
Information
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest





