fresh pictures of the next C Class

Abdul · Post by **Abdul** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:48 pm

here are some pictures of the new c class coming next year

both pics are showing the Elegance version I guess because chrome line around window

this would be Classic version or avantgarde

notice the panoramic roof on the C class , that will avalaible as an option like the E class is

goneheLL · Post by **goneheLL** » Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:12 pm

looks hot! the rear lights r like slk..

Post by **GTI VR6** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 1:47 am

looks like a honda city from the rear.

goneheLL · Post by **goneheLL** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 1:58 am

i think it will get a good market in bd! looks nice!

BRABUS® · Post by **BRABUS®** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 10:35 pm

doesnt look like a MB at all :( I still like the 2006 one better

Abdul · Post by **Abdul** » Fri Nov 10, 2006 12:00 am

ACTUALLY THE REAR IS INSPIRED BY THE S CLASS, WILL BEAT THE BMW 3SERIES SURE

sakin_uttara · Post by **sakin_uttara** » Fri Nov 10, 2006 12:14 am

in r&t magazine.. c looked different then this... :S

zoheb · Post by **zoheb** » Sat Nov 11, 2006 1:52 pm

Abdul wrote:ACTUALLY THE REAR IS INSPIRED BY THE S CLASS, WILL BEAT THE BMW 3SERIES SURE

u crazy Abdul......? 3 series has been the best Compact Luxury Sedan for years....C Class was never able to beat the 3 series.....and I don't think it will yet be....

btw, i don't like the rear.....it seems a bit too small.

Abdul · Post by **Abdul** » Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:08 pm

I am not crazy as you told Zoheb , I do believe that the C class will beat the 3 series in many division like cabin quality , materials , high tech equipement such panoramic roof , distronic and other things, diesel engines ,THE AMG VERSION POWERED BY the 6.2 liters V8 will make it hard to beat .
You know why people buy a BMW 3 series because of the name.But The c class is more confortable for more than 1 decade

Post by **arnab** » Sat Nov 11, 2006 5:02 pm

I have one word for you Abdul, wait for the M3

Abdul · Post by **Abdul** » Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:18 pm

Arnab car magazine tell that the new M3 will come with a V8 rated around 400 hp natural aspirated , the C 63 amg would have a 6.2 liters 480 hp maybe or more.But main difference will be braking system BMW cars usually brakes not as well as the Mercedes-Benz do

zoheb · Post by **zoheb** » Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:46 am

Abdul wrote:But main difference will be braking system BMW cars usually brakes not as well as the Mercedes-Benz do

since when? here are some stats from car and driver magazine for braking 70-0 mph

BMW 325i = 161 feet
MB C350 Sport = 175 feet
MB C 55 AMG = 165 feet

BMW 530i = 176 feet
MB E350 = 182 feet

BMW Z4 M = 154 feet
MB SLK 55 AMG = 156

BMW M5 = 158 feet
MB CLS 55 AMG = 161 feet

BMW M6 = 155 feet
MB SL 55 AMG = 159 feet

u can see BMW beats MB on braking in all of them.

and abt the C63 AMG, lets wait till it comes out..........but right now, I would pick the RS4 anyday

Abdul · Post by **Abdul** » Sun Nov 12, 2006 5:57 pm

Zoheb maybe those figs are true but in Europe carmagazine tell that BMW cars brake hard in the first times but after it doesn't last a longtime that's why Brembooffers a kit for M3 and other BMW

Post by **arnab** » Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:18 am

Standard brakes from any manufacturers fade with repetative usage, aftermarket brakes are designed not to fade as much. Cermic brakes harly brake at all even after a long hard day at the track. The Bimmer are known for the excellent braking always, that was not their concern over Mercs.

Please note Abdul that C63 uses a much more bigger engine than the M3. Unlike Merc, BMW does not use engines on the bigger series or M5 on their 3 series derivatives. You wont see a 3 series with a 750 engine or an M5 engine. Then you know how it would stand against the C63

RyDiNg-DuTty · Post by **RyDiNg-DuTty** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 8:45 pm

its ugly..the older 1 was way better

Information